Talk:Zayta, Hebron

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Zayta, Hebron appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the sakia (water wheel) for the former Palestinian Arab village of Zayta was built out of a Corinthian capital, marble pillars, a rough pulley, and 85 stone jars attached by grass ropes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Petersen book

Does anyone have access to this book? It mention that Zayta had a Christian minority (91 Muslim families and 7 Christian ones). I'm not sure its the same Zayta though because I can't see the whole book online and I don't know what year it is referring to. Help would be appreciated. Tiamut^talk 11:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have the book, on page 131, it is in connection with the 1596-cencus, & Petersen writes:

the Nablus district ("liwa"), is devided into four "nahiyas" (=subdistrict);
- One of these "nahiyas", namely "nahiya Qaqun", has 12 villages belonging to it, one of which is Zayta:
  - "12 villages one of which (Zayta) has a small Christian minority (91 Muslim families and 7 Christian families). ."

If Khalidi is to be trusted, then "this" Zayta was in Gaza district. And, since Qaqun is in the Tulkarm-section, I suspect the above refers to Raml Zayta, in the Tulkarm-district.

...I think I´ll put a link from the talk-page on Raml Zayta to here, for future reference....Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or it could be referring to Zeita, Tulkarm, which is still around in Tulkarem in the West Bank. I think that's more likely, but no harm in spreading the word to other possible candidates. Thanks Huldra. Tiamut^talk 23:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes; that is quite possible; I´ve done far to little on the West Bank-places..Huldra (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. In fact, I wanted to develop them more, but once all the 48 villages were made into stubs, the pressure to get them done first mounted. Still, a lot of West Bank villages, particularly those along the green line, should be documented now, as they are in danger of disappearing. Tiamut^talk 09:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it may be the 1596 census above refers to Zeita Jamma'in, which likely adopted Jamma'in to differentiate it form the other Zeita's. I have create a dismabig page at Zeita which Zayta redirects to now, given how many Zeitas there are. Tiamut^talk 11:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that the move of the village may have been resisted. Can't see the whole discussion, but this book on malaria and the Zionist project in Palestine notes, "[...] Zeita Arabs claimed, "It's better to die from malaria than from hunger, because our existence depends on the herds which need the swamps." I'll try to find more, but as I told you on your talk page, my suspicion is that there was a political reason for the move of the village too, and that the villagers were not necessarily on board. Tiamut^talk 09:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if there is still a problem here. The Zayta on Hutteroth p147 has the same coords as we give in this article. Zero^talk 15:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]