Talk:Zara Peerzada/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs) 07:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, @Smo1257. I'm sorry, but I'll have to quickfail 
this GA nomination. It fits two of the criteria under Wikipedia:Good article criteria for an immediate failure:
- It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
- It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags (See also {{QF}})
While I'm sure you worked very hard on this article, it requires substantial attention to pass the GA process. Currently, it's only a Start-class article, and in my opinion correctly rated. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)