Jump to content

Talk:Zams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Hi, I´m Brill24. I created this new article "Zams". I´m trying to help you expanding this article. My only problem is that my English grammar is not perfect (I´m Austrian, so my Englisch sounds a little bit like Arnold Schwarzeneggers). So my suggestion is: I´ll give you further information of the Austrian municipality of Zams and you help me with the correct grammar. Is that a deal? ;-)) Kind regards --Brill24 22:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ZAMS

[edit]

zams is zero age main sequence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.183.62.100 (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WRONG POPULATION DATES

[edit]

I've corrected but they will not be shown. Regards -- Drahdiwaberling (talk) 16:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]