Talk:Zagreb Synagogue/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- There are low-level grammar and syntax issues. I suggest a good third-party editor give this a once over. You might be able to get some help from WP:GOCE. Done
- Measurements should be converted using {{convert}}, e.g. 80 meters. Done
- Zagreb City Museum is already in the text (and in red). Perhpas unlink them in the captions? Done
Summary: There are just some small issues that should not be too difficult to resolve. I will put this article On Hold for for the moment. Let's try and improve these areas in this time.
Final comments: Thanks for all the hard work in making this a better article. I am now satisfied that it meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as such. -- S Masters (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your consideration, this is great news. Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this article! GregorB (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)