This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
An editor just made a zero-edit-summary deletion. That's reserved for vandalism. There was no vandalism being deleted. So a revert was in order. Let's avoid such improper editing, please. Edit summaries are always good, and necessary in situations like this. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:6C33:C3A2:EF96:6009 (talk) 04:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What are you even talking about. Your edit summary did not explain why you reverted my entire edit. If there's any "vandalism" here it's from you.-- Yankees1005:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You made a deletion in the first place. With zero edit summary. I left edit summaries all along the way. And you went on deleting - without any edit summary. I left a message here. You deleted thereafter, without an edit summary. To make matters worse -- using Rollback, the anti-vandalism tool. So, inasmuch as you have made a series of zero-edit-summary-deletions, and I've questioned this numerous times, here and in edit summaries, and you still fail to explain why you engaged in the deletion in the first place (and the second place) - pray tell. What's up? BTW, I never said you committed vandalism. I said zero edit summaries are reserved for deletions of obvious vandalism. You are not editing properly, but you haven't even read properly what I've written. What's going on? You're better than this.--2603:7000:2101:AA00:6C33:C3A2:EF96:6009 (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"You made a deletion in the first place. With zero edit summary" You're literally not even explaining which part of my edit was the "deletion" part. Are you referring to the sportskeeda reference which almost certainly is not a reliable source and does not belong on Wikipedia or the "American-Israeli" part which isn't standard because the intro is meant for a players nationality not heritage/ancestry? Anyhow, you never explained why you reverted my entire edit (changing to infielder, categories) instead of just adding back the part you think belongs there. The entire edit should not have been reverted. Using your own words, YOU are not "editing properly"-- Yankees1005:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Obviously. That is the part of your edit that was a deletion. What is your basis for claiming that the ref is not an wp:rs? And it is that ref that supports the citizenship - one is of course not a citizen due to one's ancestry unless the state in question grants such citizenship (even if they grant it based on that ancestry). That's the part I'm focused on. You must agree that one should not use tools for such a revert unless vandalism is involved, and should not engage in a zero-edit-deletion which you did -- the first step in kicking off this entire kerfluffle. If you can evidence that the ref is not RS, I am fine with its removal (if done appropriately). But you haven't done so, and I do not see your claim as ipso facto valid. But I am willing to listen. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:6C33:C3A2:EF96:6009 (talk) 06:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
