Talk:Yugoslav torpedo boat T6/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Link Allied
- Move the links for convoy, escort and minesweeping tasks, and anti-submarine operations, Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes to the lede.
- Done.
- No DABs, external links OK.
- Image appropriately licensed.
- Background section is more appropriate to the class article. Generally, a single sentence or two suffices to set the stage for an individual ship article.
- trimmed it a bit, but I think there is some need to explain what they were designed to do.
- The turbine was rated at 5,000 shaft horsepower You do mean both turbines, right?
- Fixed.
- and designed to reach a top speed of 28 knots The turbines themselves have no top speed. I'm sure that you mean that they were supposed to drive the ship at 28 kn.
- Fixed.
- Don't really care about the other F boats. Save that for the class article.
- Trimmed.
- At the outset Of what?, rephrase.
- Done.
- Fix the title capitalization in Jarman 1997b
- Done.
- Any particular reason why you use refbegin and end? I don't really see any need to make things more difficult for our visually impaired readers. Not a requirement, just asking.
- I just do it because it uses up less space.
- add "|lastauthoramp=y" to force the bibliographic entry to match the ampersand in the footnote for O'Hara, etc.
- Thanks, done.
- It would probably be a good idea to build a navbox for the Yugoslav Warships Of WWII that would allow you to delete the See also section, although it should be reserved for the class article while the individual ship articles of this class get their own navbox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Good idea, I only recently decided to do all the Yugoslav TBs, and am working on a Royal Yugoslav Navy GT. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- All done, I think. I've also made all the same changes to the T8 article. Thanks again. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Great, I'll check both later today.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, forgot my laptop at home; don't want try and edit on my new iPhone. By Monday for sure.