Talk:Yugoslav torpedo boat T4/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox; all good
Section 1;
- Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino; I think this is not an English name, if so, put on the italics Done
Section 2;
- Inconsistency in figures of full load displacement Done
  - 320 tonnes (310 long tons); prose
  - 320 t (315 long tons); infobox
- In the previous section, it is said that the requirement was "sustaining 30 knots (56 km/h) for 10 hours", here it is "980 nautical miles (1,810 km; 1,130 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)", so this satisfy the requirement. Mention it clearly.
  - I'm not sure it follows.
Section 3;
- were involved in the shelling of various Italian shore-based targets known as the Bombardment of Ancona; to a general reader it creates a confusion whether the "shelling" is known as "Bombardment of Ancona" or the "shore-based targets", make it clearer Done
7.4% confidence, violation unlikely.

All these comments are the same in T2's review. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]