Talk:Yue Hwa Building/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 15:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

1b. The needs to be expanded to appropriately summarize the entire article. See this page.
2b. Note, I have made a few changes to the in-line citations.
6a. I added an image.
7. If not for the insufficient lead, this article would pass. Until such time as the lead adequately summarizes the article, I can't pass the article.

@QatarStarsLeague: I have rewritten the lead section. How is the new lead section? It may need some copyediting. --Hildanknight (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is suitable; the article passes! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]