Talk:YuYu Hakusho/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 9, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing is of a pretty good quality throughout. Going forward past GA, I would recommend peer review to get input from previously uninvolved users, and also requesting copyediting from GOCE.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, no issues here.

3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, it is thorough. I like the structure and breakdown of component organization.

4. Neutral point of view?: Presented in a neutral and matter of fact manner, no issues here.

5. Article stability? Other than some IP stuff, article edit history appears stable, just keep an eye on that in the future. Article talk page appears stable, no present ongoing conflicts.

6. Images?: Two images used, fair use rationale provided on image pages. No issues here.

 If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]