Jump to content

Talk:Ysabel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this is hands down the fucking shittiest book I have ever read

First urban fantasy?!

[edit]

I would think that the Fionavar Tapestry, about then-contemporary college kids drawn into a fantasy realm, would rate as "urban fantasy."

The Fionavar Tapestry could hardly count as urban fantasy. It uses some modern-era characters, yes, but they spend all but a couple chapters (out of three books) in a traditional fantasy world. Urban fantasy is distinguished by setting, not characters. Think of Donaldson's "Thomas Covenant" books, which transport a similarly contemporary figure into a fantasy land, or Zelazny's "Chronicles of Amber" which spend a little time on Earth but soon skip out to Amber and the shadow worlds. Nerrin 02:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, The Fionavar Tapestry is clearly an example of crossover fantasy...urban fantasy, as you say, imposes fantasy elements on an urban "real world" setting, rather than the other way around (ie, characters from the "real world" travel to a fantasy setting). Cadence3 (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No more stub

[edit]

Working on expanding this... Cadence3 (talk) 05:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Fantasied Europe milieu"

[edit]

As written, the third sentence of the article describes all the books Mr Kay wrote between the Fionavar books and Ysabel as taking place in the same world, but they didn't. Tigana, A Song for Arbonne and the Jad books all are set in milieux reminiscent of mediaeval Europe, but they are three different milieux. I am going to pluralise "milieu" in the sentence to reflect that. Binabik80 (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ysabel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]