Jump to content

Talk:Youthanasia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HotHat (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1.Well-written:
a.the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and

  • Opening paragraph, "recordings, however", "recordings; however". Done
  • Background section, "Producer Max Norman suggested building a studio of their own.", "Producer Max Norman suggested that they build a new self-dedicated studio." Done
  • Artwork section, "UK" needs to be "United Kingdom" not abbreviated Done
  • Personnel, musician needs to be musicians or "An additional musician", also maybe remastering? Done

b.it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2.Verifiable with no original research:
a.it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

b.it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and

c.it contains no original research.

3.Broad in its coverage:
a.it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

b.it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.

5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

6.Illustrated, if possible, by images:
a.images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

b.images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Addressed all issues. The reviewer may take a second look.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]