Talk:Youthanasia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HotHat (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1.Well-written:
a.the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and

Opening paragraph, "recordings, however", "recordings; however". Done
Background section, "Producer Max Norman suggested building a studio of their own.", "Producer Max Norman suggested that they build a new self-dedicated studio." Done
Artwork section, "UK" needs to be "United Kingdom" not abbreviated Done
Personnel, musician needs to be musicians or "An additional musician", also maybe remastering? Done

b.it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2.Verifiable with no original research:
a.it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

b.it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

c.it contains no original research.

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3.Broad in its coverage:
a.it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

b.it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

6.Illustrated, if possible, by images:
a.images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

b.images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Nothing wrong here.HotHat (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed all issues. The reviewer may take a second look.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]