Talk:Youth suffrage

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 June 2021 and 31 July 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JacobCameronUCSD.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider New Section: Total Abolition of Voting Age Limits

I would like to propose adding a new section concerning the discussion on the total abolition of voting age limits. However, I am not sure whether it is more appropriate to add it under this article or rather in the article Voting age? What do you think? I suppose it rather fits in this section, as a youth and children's suffrage in its literal meaning would require the total abolition of any age limits (For further information on the issue, cf. my comment in the discussion-section of the Voting age-article). --N.Al-Saratan (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a section here for abolition and have tried to keep the Voting Age article focused on data and the youth suffrage article focused on arguments and debates about where to set the age with lots of linking back and forth. Superb Owl (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments For

The "Arguments For" and "Arguments Against" sections are very weak. I removed some of the more ridiculous unsourced claims in the "Arguments For" section. If anyone has any disagreements, feel free to say so. Alternatively, someone could make a more valid list. --Rabid Monkeys Eat Grass 03:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too lazy to check out what has been changed, I'll just add my two cents on what's there at the moment. It's not like there's anywhere else to say this anyways.

One of the arguments is that 16-year olds are legally permitted to have sex. In my opinion, a reference to the age of consent, which permits a person to have sex with an adult, is irrelevant, because having sex with an adult is no more dangerous than having sex with a peer.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a vocal supporter of youth suffrage and I'm okay with these arguments, but I thought that one needed to be rephrased, that's all. --80.235.46.66 (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also, I'm not sure, but aren't 16 year olds classified differently in different legal systems? The world doesn't end at the state or US border. --80.235.46.66 (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In Britain and America The party in power is just on a see saw! going from Conservatives to Labour and from Labour to Conservatives (equivalent of Republicans to Democrats, then Democrats to Republicans) and so on. it probably won't change anything! 77.98.165.66 (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Dependencies

Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man allow voting at age 16. See references at "Voting age". AJRG (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Youth suffrage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071012150818/http://freechild.org:80/SNAYR/suffrage.htm to http://www.freechild.org/SNAYR/suffrage.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arguments Section Is Unbalanced

There are six arguments in favour, none of which are criticised. There is only one argument against, and criticism of this argument is given more space than the argument itself. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. _TheKuygerian^contribs
_userpage 13:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture

I think s06e17 of The West Wing ("A Good Day") deserves a mention. Excerpts here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSDxg-bDw1A . Food for thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mczyzewski (talk • contribs) 17:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Arguments for and against youth suffrage"

This section should be divided into (i) an "Impact" section and an (ii) "Politics of Youth Suffrage" section. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Section Order

Shouldn't ==Arguments for and against youth suffrage==, ==Impact==, and ==Demeny voting== be before example countries (as of now US and VE)? Letting readers know the premise and understand the topic before giving them examples? _TheKuygerian^contribs
_userpage 13:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]