Talk:Your World with Neil Cavuto

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Your World with Neil Cavuto article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

POV Tag

I've decided to add to the POV tag, I do not think the critism section is very fair. Some of is unsourced, some of it seems very opionated and irrevelent. How does that fact that one guest sells an expensive news letter make his credentials 'questionable', who thinks the companies he recommends are 'questionable', and who thinks that some of the guests on the show are 'questionable'. Also, some of the things, such as having 'experts' in quotation marks seems slightly biased, i'd rather the section was changed to something like 'reception' with both postive comments and negative comments about the show. I don't think Newshounds is a good source for infomation, as it's sole purpose is to critise Fox News. --IvanKnight69 07:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Terms such as 'questionable' conflict with WP:WTA and WP:AWW Antonrojo 16:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

News story re border gate opening

The gate issue about it being opened by border agent vs Tx Gd is probably due to it being PRIVATE property. 66.68.126.197 (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]