Talk:Young Turk Revolution

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as High-importance).

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

The first paragraph is especially unreadable. For example, "identified an ancient regime in Ottoman politics in the strongest terms" doesn't make sense. Ibadibam 04:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've given revision a shot...--Shandon 22:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anti-semitism

Cut "He has been criticised by some adhering to anti-Semitism." First it contains weasel words and second it is unnecessary. Nothing here seems to indicate that the revolution occurred because of anti-semitism on either side.--Bruce Hall 14:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

genocide template

The Template:Armenian Genocide was removed from this article months ago; then it was put back, apparently on the grounds that the template actually mentioned the Young Turks. But the present article is about the Young Turk Revolution of 1908. The article did mention the Armenian Genocide as something the Young Turks later perpetrated; but this text was identical with text at the article on the Young Turks themselves. The events of 1908 otherwise have no clear connection to the later genocide; at least, the article does not spell out any such connection. Therefore there does not seem to be reason to use the Genocide template (rather than, say, an Ottoman history template). So I removed the template again, and the text that can be found at the Young Turks article. David Pierce 13:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consequences

Interesting nothing is mentioned about the consequences of the regime change. This revolt ultimately weakened the Ottoman state which led to Ottomans losing Rumelia (European territories) in Balkan Wars which were to follow, in addition to Austro-Hungarian Empire annexing Bosnia and Herzegovina the same year which it was legally only supposed to occupy and administer. The Big Hoof! (talk) 10:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC) Struck out sock. bobrayner (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Young Turk Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725162234/http://www.wzaponline.com/TheInfluenceoftheYoungTurksRevolution.pdf to http://www.wzaponline.com/TheInfluenceoftheYoungTurksRevolution.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date

No exact date when it started? Mhatopzz (talk) 07:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]