Talk:Young Romance

A fact from Young Romance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Young Romance comic book series, first published in 1947, is regarded as the first romance comic?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Comics: United States / DC Comics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Missing quote mark

The following extant phrase, which I removed from the article for discussion here before reinserting, is missing a quote mark somewhere, making it impossible to tell what is quoted opinion from a reliable source and what is the contributor's POV. Since the source is not online, someone will have to find the print publication and check the quote before we can reinsert this:

The stories "became more predictable and the edgy art was replaced by the "slick" style" that dominated the later romance/love comics. (Miller, J. J., Thompson, Maggie, Bickford, Peter & Frankenhoff, Brent, The Comic Buyer's Guide Standard Catalog of Comic Books, 4th Edition (KP Books, 2005) - "Young Romance", pp. 1599-1601) -- 207.237.223.118 (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't, it just not obvious. Here it is: "became more predictable and the edgy art was replaced by the 'slick' style"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.16.98 (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]