Talk:Young Citizen Volunteers (1912)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is there a guideline for date formats, because "the September 10, 1912" sounds odd to me. Cordless Larry 13:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. It was probably a typo of sorts. --Mal 12:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ycv 340.gif

Image:Ycv 340.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

Just to explain, I rewrote the First World War section as it was about the 36th (Ulster) Division in general rather than the YCV specifically and also had a somewhat less than neutral tone. I had explained this in my first attempt to edit but it was lost thanks to an edit conflict from some bot or other so I'm explaining here to avoid accusations of removing material (all of which was unsourced anyway). Cheers. Keresaspa (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split?

Also should this be one or two articles? I'm not sure and would like to get some other views before any decision is taken that way but the two phases do seem quite distinct and there is no direct continuity between the two groups that claimed the name. Keresaspa (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No objections after two and a half months so I went ahead and split the articles. Keresaspa (talk) 00:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]