Talk:Young Adam (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The book

This article should contain more info about the book, which was controversial at the time.

Yes and no. It's true that it would be good to see a paragraph on parallels and divergences with the book, but at the same time, an article for the book does exist, and I don't think it would be pertinent to merge both articles - it would be more relevant to improve both. I think regarding the movie, there is still a lot to do. While it wasn't a highly commercial success, there have been quite a lot of articles written about it, be it reviews or interviews with the actors, so plenty of sources to work from. Aria28 16:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penis

I removed "uncircumcised" as it does not seem relevant given the context. As Ewan McGregor is a Scotsman, and the setting of the film is 1950s Glasgow, it would be highly unusual and shocking if his penis was circumcised. 217.155.20.163 23:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The last paragraph re. Tilda Swinton needs to be rewritten to appear less biased, and cited if possible. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 01:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Young Adam movie.jpg

Image:Young Adam movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Characterisation of 'rape' scene

I've watched this film a couple of times and my assumption was that Cathie and Joe shared some kind of rough sex/humiliation fetish, and so the scene with the custard/humiliation/aggressive sex is part of this. Indeed the presentation of this scene is a little peculiar if it was intended to be non-consensually abusive. Joe makes custard for no apparent reason? She undresses down directly before the confected argument? She also appears to have quite happily climaxed and otherwise not resisted during the scene. Similarly, once Joe returns, the apartment is cleaned up and they hug quite naturally in bed, as if this is a regular conclusion of their activities. 145.224.65.172 (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]