Talk:You and What Army

Industrial Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Industrial To-do:

Top priority articles to improve to Good article status

Front 242
Front Line Assembly
Ministry
Skinny Puppy
Throbbing Gristle – needs "Musical style" and "Critical reception" sections
Wax Trax! Records

High priority articles to improve to B-Class status

Mid priority articles to improve to C-Class status

Talk:You And What Army

I doubt anyone will read this, but there is a recursive link in the side bar (David Brown), since there isn't a Wikipedia page for Boyinaband. I don't suppose either a page could be made or the link removed? It only serves to confuse now. 67.171.234.88 (talk) 04:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, i have read about the COI guidelines, and just wanted to clarify that i have made every effort to avoid bias and provide references where possible. Could you please let me know where you see any bias and how can we remove the notice at the top of the page stating that a major contributor has a close connection with the subject. Thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.102.73 (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for adding the page, now that they won RBBJ and had a cover mount on Rocksound you could say that they now have enough notability to have a wiki page. This page does need alot of work though. I will start by sorting the wording and layout of the page. Also, that notice is normally put on newer pages within the realm of Music, Films ect. It will be removed in due course when I guess the page is reviewed. I did notice though that the page was edited by one Kieranyawa. Obvious username, sorry. This artical seems to have had a history of debate about it. Skullbird11 (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Update - So I have cleaned up the artical a little. There were alot of breaks in your text and I had to remove them. You will also need references for statements made in the 'Future' section. Skullbird11 (talk) 23:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added the references to the statements in the future section. Is there anything else that needs altering, or can the COI guidelines message be removed now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.97.144 (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]