Talk:You and I (2008 film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]When is the film going to be released? Both this page and imdb say Spring 2009, but spring has passed and I can find no evidence of it having been released anywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.253.74.100 (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on You and I (2011 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927120115/http://ram-co.ru/index.phtml?page=86&nid=175 to http://ram-co.ru/index.phtml?page=86&nid=175
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mosfilm.ru/index.php?News=2007%2F0511_01&Lang=eng
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429053225/http://www.ram-co.ru/index.phtml?page=3&lng=1&PHPSESSID=c69c665bbc53774541101ed573fc48aa to http://ram-co.ru/index.phtml?page=3&lng=1&PHPSESSID=ae7b7d91052a0f14811bdf6afa67b7ed
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
What does this paragraph even mean?
[edit]This makes no sense:
World-L.com gave it a more detailed, yet mixed review. He praised the actors, describing them as "good". However, he felt the storyline and production was unusual, as he said "In itself, the movie is not bad and lay, no, it's more complicated." He praised Barton and VanSanten, whom he described as "very good", but described the screenplay: "what is present in their memories but rather the very rough draft screenplay that talks about everything and nothing is wrong and the bottom of things."