Talk:You Win or You Die/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Right. I'll review this one, and make copyedits as I go and jot notes below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- like the other article, some reception/out-of-universe material needed in lead (which is a little on the slim side)
- Added. Jclemens (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Can we link Sandy Brae somewhere....
- We don't appear to have an article on it. I'll see what I can find... Jclemens (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- like the other article, some reception/out-of-universe material needed in lead (which is a little on the slim side)
- Okay - I do sorta wish there was more out-of-universe material, but I reckon you've scoured whatever and wherever there is to scour. Hang on a sec, will bring out the green hot-cross buns. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks again, Cas. Jclemens (talk) 23:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)