Talk:You Were Never Alone

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Post-hardcore Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concept Record Reveal and Track Meanings

I added the Concept Record Reveal and Track Meanings section and noticed that it was later removed as "unecessary". I've not edited many pages on Wikipedia so I thought I would ask for feedback since I'm not used the conventions and procedures. I'd like some more information on why this section was removed. I agree that it isn't strictly necessary but you could probably make the same argument for most of the information in the article. It is, however, very relevant and seems like it could be useful information for someone interested enough to find this article. I added it specifically because I myself wanted a reference to review while listening to the songs without having to go back and scan through the reference podcast episodes every time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett.martensen (talk • contribs) 18:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've added a lot of stuff and most of it is unnecessary. It was removed because it add no encyclopedic information to the album. The source is a podcast and you could just link that as an external source. The problem is it's a primary source and we don't really need to know what the writers were thinking when they wrote it. If have often found that if it needs to be explained, it's probably not that clear in the first place. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sources

Just wondering if there are enough secondary sources listed at this point to be able to remove the Primary Sources message template? If not, then what would be required? There are plenty of articles about this album from secondary sources but it doesn't seem proper to cite them when information isn't being taken from them directly. I could add a "Reviews" or "Critical Reception" section that could quote from the many reviews, but it seems like the purpose of that would be just to get in more cited articles and not to add to the usefulness of the article. Most of the information in the article now has secondary sources cited so I feel like the message can just be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett.martensen (talk • contribs) 19:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]