Talk:You Ain't Goin' Nowhere/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 02:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the Manual of Style
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The references support the statements and all appear to be reliable sources. i assume good faith for off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One image used, tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
A well formed article. I am happy that it meets the good article standards so I am passing it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]