Talk:You've Got Another Thing Comin'

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Another Thing/Think?

There doesn't seem to be an article on here about the idiom. I was wondering which one is correct.--Jcvamp 18:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article claims the original is "think". This is wrong. The phrase "If this is what you think, you've got another think coming" is a pun on the original phrase "you've got another thing coming". 211.74.121.185 (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's an odd claim, and seems on the face of it to be wrong. What authority can you cite to back it up? TypoBoy (talk) 00:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article clears up the Thing/Think confusion in the third paragraph of the intro, with references. This was added in March 2011. "Think" came first, predating "Thing" by about 20 years.Dutchmonkey9000 (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't prove anything except that there are earlier cites for one than the other. It's possible the other was in use but just never got cited or cites were lost or some other thing happened. Particularly since this is like 100+ years ago.76.226.122.139 (talk) 00:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not the place to argue this one way or another. I removed the whole part talking about it because it was clearly original research. DreamGuy (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that there ought to be at least a notation that somebody has noticed! Since the lyrics do make "think" the first reference, this is clearly a common but distorted version of the original idiom (Etiology here:http://grammarist.com/usage/another-think-coming/. DCyphert (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JP YGATC Picture Disc.jpg

Image:JP YGATC Picture Disc.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Pungen sticker fram genom näsan i morgon klockan 121 på kvällen[reply]

Cover version by Saxon

I suggest to name the cover version by Saxon. I have to admit that I don´t know on which album it was published first time. However, you can watch the song performed on "To Hell and back again" (double dvd, live) or take a look at Youtube. Greetings from Germany... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.116.101 (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on You've Got Another Thing Comin'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071118121525/http://www.vh1.com:80/shows/dyn/the_greatest/103446/episode_this_list.jhtml to http://www.vh1.com/shows/dyn/the_greatest/103446/episode_this_list.jhtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]