Talk:You're with me, leather
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
In the press
[edit]http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/sports/story.html?id=07daa4b0-ce82-4dd9-b946-5833f524f97b&k=14585 -- Zanimum 15:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Google result
[edit]It's now the second result in Google for a search result for "Chris Berman".. so, people are reading this page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omarcheeseboro (talk • contribs) 15:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]I've removed most of the description from the introduction. It seems to me this is unnecessary. The primary reason this is noteable is because it's a successful meme. The background/story is relevant but doesn't IMHO need to be in the introduction since it's not ultra important when it comes to understanding the subject of an article which is a meme, not a pick-up-line. It especially shouldn't be the first thing that is described. Also see my comments here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're with me, leather Nil Einne (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- It may be helpful to compare to All your base are belong to us which has some similarities. I've modeled the intro here similarly since I feel it works well. First we describe what it is (it's a popular phrase and internet phenomenon), then we describe where it came from (from Deadspin who made it popular) then we describe where Deadspin claim it originated from. Nil Einne (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
LA Times
[edit]Unfortunately the LA Times link is now dead since they want you to pay for their archives. It may be better if this is sourced directly the the paper (if this appeared in the print paper). Could someone clarify from the source that it was indeed a respected journalist who was the one doing the flirting? The story on Deadspin is submitted by a friend of the claimed other person Nil Einne (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Citation needed
[edit]We quote whom Will Leitch calling the anonymous contributor "a respected journalist," but I see no citation for this in any of the references. 68.40.44.250 (talk) 18:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- The source is right there at the end of the paragraph. What's the problem? faithless (speak) 11:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)