Talk:You're Not Sorry/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Starting the review. ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• "It enjoyed positive commercial outcomes in North America" should be rewritten. Doesn't quite flow. I would use "Achieved". Done
• "In the United States, "You're Not Sorry" also at number eleven on the Billboard Hot 100 and[...]" Needs to be rewritten. Done
• Link number 7 should not be linked to a url, see 4 Minutes to see how it should be linked. Done
• In the article it says the song has been certified Gold, it needs a certification section and a proper link.. this is the link needed : link The one currently used doesn't link to the actual certification. Done
• If possible, there should be a "Personal Section". Never mind, not all GA's contain this.
• "Swift wrote "You're Not Sorry", inspired by an ex-boyfriend who was revealed to be who she thought he was." Needs to be rewritten, doesnt flow or sound correct. Done
• "She wrote "You're Not Sorry" an an emotional state,[...]" double an, i think you meant "in an emotional state[...]" Done
• "The circumstances faced a point[...]" I think you mean... "The circumstances reached a point[...]" Done
• Under chart performance, there are two back to back sentences starting with "The song was[...]" (last and second last sentences to be specific). I would reword the last sentence to say : In Canada, the song debuted and peaked at number eleven on the Canadian Hot 100. Something like that, just so they dont start with the same opening statement.  Done
• The main image is 300x302. Images should not be any bigger then 300x300. Its needs a new upload. Done
• "You're Not Sorry" spent a total of five weeks on the Billboard Hot 100. "You're Not Sorry" also peaked at number twenty-one the now-defunct Pop 100 Chart". Back to back opening again. Done

Please correct these, i will add more(if found) and begin the prose review once these issues are addressed. ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Prose Review:

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Good range and well formatted.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Almost spot on. Except ref 21 should be italicized "Miami New Times" is a newspaper.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)