Jump to content

Talk:Yoshino, Nara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stated Number Of Sakura Trees Is Suspect

[edit]

The Yoshino article states: 'Mt. Yoshino is famous for its 500,000 sakura trees'. This number is suspect if not implausible.

There are many varied estimates of the number of sakura trees. For instance, http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e4150.html states there are 30,000 (thirty thousand) trees, but contradicts itself by listing the four divisions of trees in the shimo, naka, kami, and oku senbon, each of which are a thousand trees, but also contradicts our Yoshino article which doesn't mention the oku senbon.

Dorling and Kindersley's Eyewitness Travel Guide to Japan states Yoshino has 100,000 cheery trees. Again, this number is suspect.

Starting with the 500,000 trees figure, simple arithmetic will show that there's not enough room in Yoshino for half a million cherry trees, once you factor out houses, roads, other non-cherry deciduous trees, and Sugi trees which to my eyes appear to vastly outnumber the cherry trees.

Yours In Pleasant Hanami

--HenryMcGilton (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasonable question is put in context by an illustrated scroll which just happens to be featured now in the on-line gallery of the National Archives of Japan. While the actual numbers may still be inexact, the paragraph you've wondered about now explains:
A 1714 account explained that, on their climb to the top, travelers would be able to enjoy the lower 1,000 cherry trees at the base, the middle 1,000 on the way, the upper 1,000 toward the top, and the 1,000 in the precincts of the inner shrine at the top.<.ref>Kaibara Ekiken. (1714). Yoshinoyama syokeizu.<./ref>
Perhaps this becomes a good step in the right direction? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yoshino, Nara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]