Talk:Yokinen Show Trial

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biased Title

I’m a lay contributor and not familiar with your policies. Nevertheless, is the use of the adjective "show" really necessary here? I have never heard it used to describe this historical event, and I am not sure what aspect of the article’s contents, other than the mere fact that this was a CPUSA event (and therefore evil), substantiates its use. 199.111.225.112 (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Section Title

I am not sure why the word trial is in quotes 199.111.225.112 (talk) 18:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity and Formatting

This article could certainly use some work - I'm thinking of tackling it if that is okay. The section on the trial is framed in an unusual way. It also is clearly written with a biased slant, with gems in the actual article such as: "This book is one of the few CP “memoirs” by a leading black communist and is an invaluable contribution that should be read by all comrades." It also says the trial spurred mass support for the CP from black workers and "peasants" (??), but cites nothing to prove this. Not to mention phrases like "bourgeois press" thrown in there. These are blatant violations of objectivity standards and should be rewritten. Citations aren't formatted properly either and secondary sources could use some updating too. Will try and do this when I can. Viralworld (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]