Talk:Yoichi Hiruma/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 04:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Taking this. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Checklist

Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Disambig links: OK
Reference check: OK

Comments: This is one of the best articles that I have reviewed since restarting reviewing GANs again, and I mean that. I checked for issues, but there was not really too much to find faults with. The character is well covered, and far better than anything covered in similar works like those by Helen McCarthy. Which is a definite plus in my eyes. Since the only thing I found were some prose issues, let's get to the quick fixes before passing.

"Due to the lack of interest in that sport..." - the sport
"In the first adaptation of the Eyeshield 21 manga, a 2003 Jump Festa OVA titled The Phantom Golden Bowl, he was voiced by Shin-ichiro Miki.[6] " - Word flow is poor
" In the English dubbing, the role has been voiced by Derek Stephen Prince.[7]" - was voiced by not "has been"

And to be completely fair, that's the only thing I really caught as an issue. The "other appearances" section could be filled out a little more on the details of his appearances in the Jump Super Stars and Jump Ultimate Stars titles. Going to place on hold for fixes, but very well done overall. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, @ChrisGualtieri:! Could you check it? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]