Talk:Yogini temples/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Amkgp (talk · contribs) 14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review this. Complete review soon to follow. — Amkgp 💬 14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Done.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Rediscovery

In When Vidya Dehejia studied them for her 1986 book Yogini Cult and Temples for the National Museum, Delhi, she recorded that the shrines were "remote and difficult of access", scarcely explored since Alexander Cunningham's visits in the 19th century for what became the Archaeological Survey of India, and frequented by dacoits, gangs of robbers, who used the temples as places of refuge unknown to the authorities. is little confusing. Can you rewrite like "Alexander Cunningham's visits in the 19th century, who founded the Archaeological Survey of India" or any thing better.

Done.

Characteristics

Please add link ghouls at flesh-eating ghouls

Done.

Practices

Please add link Prana Pratishtha at Activities included pranapratishtha; Kapalika at The earliest yogini practices were kapalika mortuary rites

Done.

Sources

Please add the missing link and ISBN for: Donaldson, Thomas Eugene (2002). Tantra and Sakta Art of Orissa. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld

Added.

Overall, I have found some minor issues only listed above. Putting on hold for these corrections. — Amkgp 💬 17:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. I've addressed all the issues to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap, Thank you for creating the article and nominating for GAN. Passing for GA. — Amkgp 💬 17:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]