Talk:Yellow-footed rock-wallaby

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Biota Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Yellow-footed rock-wallaby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Status of Reserve in New South Wales

The article states twice that the Coturaundee Nature Reserve in New South Wales is now part of the Mutawintji National Park. This is incorrect. It is managed by the New South Wales Parks and Wildlife Service, but is not part of the Mutawintji National Park (which is almost adjacent). It is now known as Mutawintji Nature Reserve. See http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/NationalParks/parkHome.aspx?id=N0726, the Website of NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, page on Mutawintji Nature Reserve. This needs to be corrected. Can someone confirm? Ptilinopus (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description updated

The section was rewritten due to the lack of sources supplied. Changes made

reference to it being a handsome marsupial removed. Can't find supporting evidence. This is the only edit that the editor made in Wikipedia
reference to it previously being killed for its pelt moved to the conservation section. Source supplied
The description was limited to a type locality. Now expanded to its entire range by melding 3 sources
weight range corrected.
conversions from metric not supplied Jameel the Saluki (talk) 07:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]