Talk:Year of the Black Rainbow

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Here We Are Juggernaut

I keep seeing this put up as their first single for Year of the Black Rainbow. But as far as I know it has not been confirmed and is only a rumor. Source?

Source: http://www.amazon.com/Here-We-Are-Juggernaut/dp/B003A7L0FY/ref=dm_ap_alb14 — Frozentoast (talk) 07:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Broken

The link for The Broken leads to a disambiguation page, which leads to the YOTBR page. I'm removing it, but feel free to rollback if I'm in error. --Sigafoos (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track Lengths

Are there any other sources that confirm Allmusic's track lengths for the songs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbenevl (talk • contribs) 04:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the lengths on the (CD quality) leak as well, so they would appear to be correct. The album leaked several weeks ago. Ringer7 (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spin Review

I'm not sure Spin's review should really be included. It's not really a review at all.192.138.178.107 (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the Spin review is an embarrassment for any form of music critique. LD18 (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Along the same lines, I feel that The Guardian's review shouldn't really be included...it's little more than a paragraph, and is no where near being a comprehensive review. Much like the Spin review, I feel that it is also an embarrassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.167.51 (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the spin review. However, the Guardian review, although short, is still coherent and better edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbenevl (talk • contribs) 03:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you're right; it just feels like he (or she) hardly spends any time critiquing the album itself. Two songs are mentioned in the whole thing, and the rest seems to be more of a shot at the fanbase instead. I suppose that's just my opinion, though.