Talk:Yasin Mazhar Siddiqui

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common Name

Pinging both GorgeCustersSabre and Vice regent, this article was earlier at "Yasin Mazhar Siddiqi" ever since I created it. Our friend GorgeCustersSabre moved it today to where it is now. But I believe that none of these two are WP:COMMONNAME here. While I make a search on Google, I get: "Yasin Mazhar Siddiqi", 1290 results, 2: "Muhammad Yasin Mazhar Siddiqi", 2880 results and 3: "Yasin Mazhar Siddiqui", 4270 results, which indicates that the common name for the subject is Yasin Mazhar Siddiqui. The fact that why I had created this article with "Siddiqi" is simple that I dislike making the excessive usage of "u" with such words and wasn't aware then of WP:COMMONNAME. I hope my moving this article to "Yasin Mazhar Siddiqui" wouldn't be seen as problematic. Regards, ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend The Aafī, actually, your explanation convinces me that you are right. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.VR _talk 21:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]