Talk:Yarn weight

I suggest this be merged into the yarn page. Thoughts?Ariadia (talk) 13:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

table--> prose?

I question the need for a tag saying the lists should be turned into prose. Maybe what's meant is that the lists need some accompanying prose – otherwise these lists are actually tables, as they stand. Manytexts (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

tag challenge

Took up the tag challenge, as per multiple issues, expanded prose, provided section headers, typo & more references. Left the call for an expert. You can never have too many.Manytexts (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

missing page

The reference #7 : "Learn the Basics". crochetaustralia.com.au. Retrieved 2014-07-12. -- can't be found -- that title (for right handeds) and a list doesn't have the yarn information. A link goes to a book on the subject of crochet. At this point decided to leave as is, Manytexts (talk) 08:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Table should probably be removed

Aside from the Craft Yarn Council in the US, there is no standardization for yarn weights (and even in the US, very few, at least in the knitting community, actually use the CYC's system). Ravelry's standard of yarn weights (https://www.ravelry.com/help/yarn/weights) is probably the most comprehensive, but it's in no way official. Given that yarn weights are not standardized, that the categories are arbitrary and don't always overlap well between countries, and that the majority of references in this table are hobbyist sites that don't agree with one another, the whole table should probably be removed. wickedDesigns (talk) 01:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be better to leave it (it IS still here a year later) and add a note that no one actually agrees. On a related note, I was planning on adding a column for the count system used by most weavers. smIsle (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]