Talk:Yaquina Bay

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katiedziedzic, Huynhsa, Kowalskm.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Classmates

A couple of notes from reading over the article:

In the first sentence, the word 'typical' is confusing. Typical to what? This modifier should probably by removed if it cannot be explained better: "Yaquina Bay (/jəˈkwɪnə/ yə-KWIN-ə) is a typical coastal estuarine comnunity"
The sentence "The Yaquina Bay in Newport is a popular tourist destination along the Pacific Coast Highway, with a variety of interesting biological and geological features." should exclude the last part "with a variety of interesting biological and geological features". It is a broad statement that is not fact.
In the section 'Economy' and the sentence "As of 2014, the highest percentage of the Newport workforce is employed in management, business, science, and arts (36.7%), while only 8.9% are employed in natural resources, construction, and maintenance.", please include the percentages for management, business, and science.
In the section 'Upwelling', please provide one or two sources for the claims.
In the 'Physical Characteristics' section, consider adding more information about the stratification of the estuary. That's important for biological factors. To start, check out this paper, particularly the paper's Methods: Study Area subheading. (Lemagie, E. P. & Lerczak, J. A. A Comparison of Bulk Estuarine Turnover Timescales to Particle Tracking Timescales Using a Model of the Yaquina Bay Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 1797–1814 (2015).)

Good job so far! --|SeaMonsterFromTheDeep

Hello! What a clean and professional looking page! I'm wondering if you really need subheadings under History of Yaquina Bay and Environmental concerns section. I think it would be fine to just have your content directly under the top level heading. Cheers! Cold water kid (talk) 19:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OSU Wikieducation

For our Wiki Education project, we added information for this page. We incorporated existing information from the page before it was edited by us (pronunciation, links to the Bay Bridge and Newport, the "See Also" section, and picture). Huynhsa (talk) 23:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That is an impressive contribution. I see there is some minor work needed, mostly style issues like capitalization and punctuation goes before a <ref> ... </ref> construction, not after. But all in all, a very valuable series of contributions! Thank you! —EncMstr (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Style issues duly noted. I'll work on that right now. Huynhsa (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yaquina Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6gpGlyhlr?url=http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk to http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]