Talk:Yantacaw Brook

Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Yantacaw Brook. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yantacaw Brook Park

There is no reason to repeat material about brook in park section. There is no reason to ad redundant information in infobox. There is no reason to keep dead links. There is no basis for keeping OR.Djflem (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Djflem:, it is my understanding that it is generally considered against WP:CONSENSUS for an editor to unilaterally remove material that has been added as the result of a discussion. In this case, the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey called for at least some portion of the material on the old page to be added here. Your removal based on your personal opinion seems to demonstrate an WP:OWNERSHIP attitude. Please expand on why you believe the previous discussion was incorrect. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understandng that people read what they are adding to Wikipedia. Once you've reviewed the entire article, can you get back to this talk page about why you would believe the information you're adding is relevent, useful, helpful, interesting, correctly placed, referenced, etc. Please explain how it is an addtion/improvement to the piece and not just a repetition of what is already in it? ThanksDjflem (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]