A fact from Yangshan Quarry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 September 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the giant stele (section pictured) with which the Yongle Emperor meant to honor his father, never left the quarry?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
My main source (Yang and Lu, 2001) doesn't say a word on the decision-making involved beyond what I wrote in the article. My own personal guess (which, of course, may be wide off the mark) is that Yongle's engineers must have had a good idea of the problem from the very beginning (it is not for nothing that the 17-meter 12th-century stele from Shou Qiu is called Wan Ren Chou - "10,000 Men's Sorrow"), but everyone was afraid to break the news to the emperor. I wonder sometimes if the same was the case with the famous (and somewhat controversial) "44-zhang long, 18-zhang wide" (roughly 130 m by 54 m) treasure ships supposedly built for Zheng He's fleet at exactly the same time...
I will be on lookout for any research that would shed more light on this story, but I am not that optimistic that anyone has said a definitive word on this. I understand that the actual references to this project in Yongle era documents are quite sparse (some very brief entries in Ming Shilu, and similarly brief references in a few other contemporary works), so we may never know... By the way, there are interesting artefacts from that period - such as the "lost tortoise" near Ming Xiaoling - for which there may be no known textual references at all, after all. -- Vmenkov (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
