Talk:Yakovlev Yak-25 (1947)

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

military

It would be good if the lead used the word military in the opening sentence. I am going to make this change, but I assume that it is something that, if accepted as good form, would need to be repeated in many articles, and I would need guidance.

Background: I stumbled onto this article (wasn't what I was looking for) but then struggled for several moments to ascertain what sort of aircraft it was - I didn't recognize the word interceptor at first. Jd2718 15:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take it back for now. I see this as necessary, but am not sure how to make the change without disrupting the lead. I will go to the Wikiproject and see if someone there has good ideas for wording. Jd2718 15:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yak-30

Merge or separate ? Need some opinions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mothmolevna (talk • contribs) 14:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No page numbers were used in the citations, so I've dropped it one level.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

This page need a disambiguation note with the Yak-25 family of 1952 and later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.224.137 (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tailplane section

Removed "To cure the buffeting the tail unit was replaced with one using an NACA 004 aerofoil section.^[1]" The quoted section doesn't make sense ; it certainly wouldn't be 20% t/c ratio with max thickness at 25%, that would be ridiculous, and there is not a dicky bird about a "NACA 004" section in NACA airfoil OR [1]. Anybody any ideas?--Petebutt (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Gordon quotes 20% thickness, while NACA004 is rarely used in tail units thicker than 9%

[1] Gordon quotes 20% thickness, while NACA004 is rarely used in tail units thicker than 9%

[1]