Talk:Yakovlev Yak-19/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1;
  • Mention "OKB" in full, perhaps in italics as it is a Russian name, and explanation in braces
  • Mention about Lyulka TR-1, turbojet etc.
  • had been used previously; "previously" in the sense? Could mention the aircraft in which the design was used
  • he was provided; rephrase to maintain gender neutrality
    • Soviet fighter pilots of this period were all male.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
• Section 2;
  • Link Shpitalny Sh-3 autocannon
  • with the Hero of the Soviet Union, Lieutenant Colonel Mikhail Ivanov, at the controls; like this, it feels that "Hero of the Soviet Union" look like a position, rather than a title. Perhaps "with the Lieutenant Colonel Mikhail Ivanov (Hero of the Soviet Union awardee), at the controls" or something similar would do.
    • Probably best just to drop the medal entirely.
  • Lavochkin La-152#Izdeliye 156; just "Izdeliye 156" would be enough
  • I see that Sergei Anokhin was also given the honour of "Hero of the Soviet Union", so better to mention that too.
  • Rolls-Royce Derwent is over-linked
• 0% confidence, violation unlikely

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)