Talk:Xylophanes rhodochlora
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Material copied/closely paraphrased from CATE
[edit]I've removed a paragraph that is nearly word-for-word taken from http://www.cate-sphingidae.org/taxonomy/Xylophanes/pyrrhus.html. it is my understanding that the author believed the source to have a compatible license with Wikipedia, but the CATE license is Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License (cc by-nc-sa), whereas ours is Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License (cc by-sa). I was going to rephrase it myself, but as I don't know anything about the topic, it might be better if someone who does can put it into their own words. --BelovedFreak 19:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xylophanes rhodochlora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111112143007/http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xrhodocl.htm to http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xrhodocl.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)