Talk:Xiu Xiu: The Sent Down Girl
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Sex scene controversy
[edit]Someone should mention the "sex sence" controversy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.166.160.48 (talk) 2 September 2006
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xiu Xiu: The Sent Down Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060303072752/http://movies.yahoo.com:80/movie/1800020037/info to http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800020037/info
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
"docile"?
[edit](Plot description):
"Lao Jin, emasculated and docile, can only watch in sadness as Xiu Xiu loses hope in the system and in herself."
Is "docile" really a/ the right word to use here, for a (free?) human being? To me (I am no native speaker of English so cannot be completely sure if my feeling is right or wrong) it seems this word is used to describe kept animals and speaking of enslaved people or of people whom the (racist) speaker regards as unequal, animal-like etc. - does this fit here?? or am I just wrong? 2A02:3030:80D:B019:1:0:F032:BCAB (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)