Jump to content

Talk:Xichang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Intelsat incident

[edit]

I think the Intelsat incident might need to remain covered in the article. It was featured in international media and seems very much like an undisputed fact to me. The only point of dicussion is about the number of fatalities caused, I think we should just mention the official chinese government numbers as well as those reported in the international press.

88.74.114.80 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then find a source other than YouTube. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 贡献 (C) 20:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Xichang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xichang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use as ROC capital

[edit]

This edit by Special:Contributions/174.89.100.11 claims that Xichang was used as the ROC capital at the end of the Chinese Civil War using this source. A Google translation does not seem to support this; mentions of its role:

  • "to use Xichang as a base to control the southwest"
  • "First of all, the Southwest Military and Political Chief Office was moved from Chongqing to Xichang..."

suggest it was used as a base for military headquarters, not the national capital.

174.89.100.11, perhaps you could clarify how you got the information? - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found it on Google but will go further and it’s on the keywords. 174.89.100.11 (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]