Talk:Xiayadong Township

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bhutan Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maplink outline

Just confirming, with regard to the territory of Bhutan, the Xiayadong outline is as per China's claim? DTM (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously. Such are the hidden meanings of China's trade deals. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "lack of knowledge" criticism that Frank Gardner levels at the Survey of India definitely applies here. The British administerd the Chumbi Valley for 3 years following the Younghusband Expedition. Nothing stopped the Survey of India from surveying it and defining its borders. But Frank Gardner himself has nary a word to say about it.

As far as I know the border shown in US maps never appeared in any Survey of India map. J. Claude White described the border quite precisely. But the Survey of India couldn't be bothered. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]