Talk:Xiaxue/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: – Plarem ^{(User | talk | contribs)} 21:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Needs to have more content to pass.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I think a lot of content is missed.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Vandal edit war, failed section.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One picture. A Good Article needs more.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   – Plarem ^{(User | talk | contribs)} 21:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Notes

• A lot more content is going to be needed.
• A lot more pictures are going to be needed.
• Since a lot more content, then you need to verify it.
• Block the page to vandals.
• Add sub-titles (Level 3, Lvl. 4) (=== ===; ==== ====)
• When finished I encourage you to nominate the article again.