Talk:Xerocomellus chrysenteron
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Xerocomellus chrysenteron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071026124356/http://www.first-nature.com/fungi/id_guide/Boletales/xerocomus_chrysenteron.htm to http://www.first-nature.com/fungi/id_guide/boletales/xerocomus_chrysenteron.htm
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110606005854/http://www.mtsn.tn.it/bresadola/gallery.asp?code=30&lang=eng to http://www.mtsn.tn.it/bresadola/gallery.asp?code=30&lang=eng
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110720010621/http://www.basidiochecklist.info/DisplayResults.asp?intGBNum=13558 to http://www.basidiochecklist.info/DisplayResults.asp?intGBNum=13558
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110720010628/http://www.basidiochecklist.info/DisplayResults.asp?intGBNum=42047 to http://www.basidiochecklist.info/DisplayResults.asp?intGBNum=42047
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Contradiction
[edit]The section on taxonomy states "It now resides back in the genus Boletus, and sports its 1791 binomial, and authority once again, and is currently known as Boletus chrysenteron Bull." which contradicts the next sentence "Recent phylogenetic analysis supports the placement of X. chrysenteron as the type species of the new genus Xerocomellus, described by Šutara in 2008.", the name of the article and the first sentence "Xerocomellus chrysenteron, formerly known as Boletus chrysenteron or Xerocomus chrysenteron". - Episcophagus (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)