Jump to content

Talk:Xenotime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name origin

[edit]

Didn't the meaning of the word Xenotime come from people (maybe Greeks) who gave it as gifts to strangers? I'm not so sure. Maybe not... 74.116.142.240 21:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reference I added for etymology writes
Although he retracted his supposed discoveries, the echoes of [Jons Jacob] Berzelius’s failures were not immediately forgotten. The mineral in which he believed he had found a new metal was called by French mineralogist François Sulpice Beudant (1787-1850) "kenotime," taken from the Greek κενός, "vain," and τιμή, "honor," to highlight the regrettable failure of the famous Swedish chemist. However, the original intent of punishing the vainglorious Berzelius was disappointed; with time the word "kenotime" became "xenotime".[1]
so, that seems to explain the allusion to vanity. Rt3368 (talk) 04:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Fontani, Marco; Costa, Mariagrazia; Orna, Virginia (2014). The Lost Elements: The Periodic Table's Shadow Side. Oxford University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0199383-344.

Etymology, polish

[edit]

I made a proper etymology paragraph out of the last part of the lead and included a reference (see above). I polished up a few sentences and fixed some grammar. Rt3368 (talk) 04:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date of discovery

[edit]

I changed the date of discovery from 1832 (same year as the publication of volume 2 of Beudant's Traité élémentaire de minéralogie) to 1824. Is 1832 accepted even though Berzelius's submission to Annales de Chimie et de Physique (1825) 2 (29) p 337 admitted his error and Lost Elements notes that Berzelius made his erroneous claim of a new "earth" in 1815? He must have been examining the mineral then. By 1824, Berzelius published Undersökning af några Mineralier ("Examination of some minerals") identifying the mineral as yttrium phosphate. Which date is correct?

Rt3368 (talk) 04:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xenotime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong name

[edit]

The name "xenotime" is wrong. The correct name is xenotime-(Y) (or xenotime-(Yb)). See, e.g., https://www.mindat.org/min-4333.html. "Xenotime" is a GROUP name. Eudialytos (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hackergroup

[edit]

Missing. [1] --Itu (talk) 06:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]