Talk:Xaltocan, Tlaxcala
A fact from Xaltocan, Tlaxcala appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Disputed tag
[edit]This article confuses two xaltocans. One is the island city in lake texcoco inhabited by the Otomi people before the spanish conquest. Lake texcoco is now dry and this xaltocan is a part of Mexico City. However both of the sources used are about a second place called xaltocan, namely the modernday municipio of Xaltocan in the state of Tlaxcala. This mixture means that in fact nothing stated in the article is correct. I will take steps to amend this situation shortly but will start by placing a totally disputed tag on the article so that readers will know the information is unreliable.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 13:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Taken care of now.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 14:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Eucalyptus Tree
[edit]The picture and it's caption are misleading. The picture is of a giant wild eucalyptus (over 80m high) in Tasmania. Eucalyptus were introduced to Xaltocan, and according to the article are found only in the city. The caption says "such as this one." I doubt that they reach this height in Xaltocan. Even if they do reach such heights, a picture of a eucalyptus in an urban area (preferably actually in Xaltocan) would be much more appropriate.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Xaltocan, Tlaxcala. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.e-local.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/tlaxcala/mpios/29040a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xaltocan, Tlaxcala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722225151/http://www.xochimilco.df.gob.mx/tradiciones/ferias/xaltocan.html to http://www.xochimilco.df.gob.mx/tradiciones/ferias/xaltocan.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)