Talk:X-Men Origins: Wolverine/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Congratulations to all those involved in bringing this up to GA status, because I am passing it off. The article is dully cited with over 100 references, and includes comprehensive info on just about every from of production. However, I do have brief concerns, but not anything suitable enough to block this from GA status. If anyone would like to move forward with this article on either A-Class or Feature article status, then you should take the following into high account. Another peer review would also be recommended.

I would suggest trimming the first paragraph in the Lead section, and have the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs expanded a little bit more in attempting to summarize the entire article. The Plot section should be trimmed; make sure it doesn't get any longer than what it is right now. Some of the citations in the Cast section aren't necessary because Wolverine is not longer an upcoming film, therefore Cast descriptions describing the character's powers or attitude in the film don't need to be cited. Nonetheless, these concerns are minor and do no block my passing this review. Great job once again. Wildroot (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

GA pass

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: