Talk:Wrust

This article was nominated for deletion on September 1 2008. The result of the discussion was delete.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Please just give me a week to work on it. I can see why the article is not currently notable or verifiable, but I will make a big effort to change this. Thanks --Dumbassman (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

I am not sure why this article has been nominated for speedy deletion when it uses multiple sources that, in my estimate, pass the Reliable Source (RS) guidelines. I think the burden of proof here is on the nomination to delete.--Discott (talk) 20:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]