Talk:Wrongful death claim

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am somewhat confused by the assertion that a tort must be rooted in common law as opposed to statute. This is the first time that I have read such a claim. PhatJew 10:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"if not from commmon law must be construed strictly" is basic tenet - not fair or moral but thats how those lawyers play

Automatic win by Plaintiff

I am somwhat confused by the folowing:

"Unlike most criminal law cases, private parties bring the suit. In principle, the defendant can refuse to testify on the grounds of self-incrimination but if a defendant invokes this right, the defendant has presented no case and the plaintiff automatically wins the case."

Can someone please provide a citation for this, and preferrably an explanation. Surely a Defendant can refuse to testify, by invoking their right not to self-incriminate depending upon the jurisdiction in question, but still present a defense. Their defense could involve calling their own witnesses; presenting arguments to the trier of fact; and cross-examing the witnesses of the plaintiff, whom with the burden of proof would usually lie. -Signed by: Chazz - (responses). @ 15:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@Chazz88 I su Can you sue 3 different entries together wrongful death? Two different people and the Hotel where the person was found dead. the Hotel the dead person lived in for three years. I don't know how to send. Maybe just leave as is! thanks 38.186.79.180 (talk) 03:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITS a civil case

Murder and wrongful death claims

This article needs to clarify whether intentional murder can be the subject of a wrongful death claim.

This link [1] states: "Wrongful death" is a type of lawsuit which alleges that the victim died or was killed as a result of negligence, malpractice or other acts committed by another party (called the defendant), except for intent to commit murder.

The bolded text above would seem to exclude murder but since O.J. Simpson was sued using a wrongful death claim for allegedly murdering two people how is that possible? --Cab88 14:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corpse Justice

The article says that 'under common law, a dead person cannot bring a lawsuit...'.

Surely under any law the dead person is at a very considerable disadvantage, so perhaps that needs to be rephrased? I don't feel qualified. --bodnotbod 23:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

another weak article by wiki

no mention of lineal descendants