Jump to content

Talk:Wrinkle (duck)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk18:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by RoySmith (talk). Self-nominated at 19:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Wrinkle the duck; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article created on 12 July, and meets the length requirement. All sources are, as far as I can tell, reliable for the material they are cited for. Earwig reveals no copyvio, and I didn't spot any instances of unacceptably WP:Close paraphrasing. There are no obvious neutrality issues. Both hooks are properly cited and interesting; I prefer ALT0 with the mention of custom shoes. QPQ has been done. Some comments out the content:

  • Wrinkle ran her first marathon in 2021, at approximately two months of age. – that can't be right, Wrinkle would have been three (almost four) months old already on 1 January 2021. It also fails verification.
  • content creator and circus jugglers – surely either both singular or both plural?

Ping RoySmith. TompaDompa (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I dropped the bit about her age. I had calculated that myself, and I guess I did the math wrong. It's not essential anyway, so better to just drop it. The plural/singular thing was really awkward wording on my part. I had a source saying one of them was a content creator and both were jugglers and tried to express that. Poorly. I cleaned that up.
  • Yeah, I like ALT0 better myself. I've struck ALT1. RoySmith (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith and TompaDompa: Cute article but source 9 states, Upon further investigation into duck world records, Wrinkle might be the first to waddle 1,000m and do it at such a blazing speed of 3.31 km/h. The record is still under ratification, according to the non-existent World Duck Athletics panel. And source seven does not mention a world record just a medal. So is the world record a quirky pass? Bruxton (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0a: ... that Wrinkle Five Star set a 1km world record (unratified) of 18:08 running in custom shoes? RoySmith (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine both with including the "(unratified)" and excluding it. It's a pretty clear attempt at humor by the source and I think the silliness carries over appropriately either way. TompaDompa (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]